I would like to hear your input and your own views on the existence of a deity. And why did he make it such a conflict-ridden, destructive scheme?
The notion that God never intervenes or communicates with the universe, or may have evolved into the universe, makes it difficult, if not by definition impossible, to distinguish between a universe with God and one without. Outside of these three objections against the arguments for the existence of god, I also have some arguments that I personally think cast light against the existence of god: Alvin Plantinga presents an argument for the existence of God using modal logic.
He then argued that the human desire for perfect justice, perfect peace, perfect happiness, and other intangibles strongly implies the existence of such things, though they seem unobtainable on earth.
I am especially interested in hearing your thoughts on this because I feel like it would be a contentious topic. An agnostic theist believes in the existence of a god or God, but regards the basis of this proposition as unknown or inherently unknowable.
In monotheistic religions outside the Abrahamic traditionsthe existence of God is discussed in similar terms. The real question is whether JehovahZeusRaKrishna, or any gods of any religion exist, and if so, which gods?
The real question is not whether a "most perfect being" or an "uncaused first cause" exist. Finally, harsh, unkind, or sarcastic comments will not be tolerated by any party.
The history of man is filled with myths and legends to explain the unexplainable. Rather, he used the description of the earth and the universe to prove the existence of God. This will be significant as we discuss the Bible and salvation.
If he go farther, and, after an investigation into the nature and reach of human knowledge, ending in the conclusion that the existence of God is incapable of proof, cease to believe in it on the ground that he cannot know it to be true, he is an agnostic and also an atheist, an agnostic-atheist—an atheist because an agnostic.
Most of these arguments do not resolve the issue of which of these figures is more likely to exist. The purpose of this question is twofold: All group members should find a way to openly discuss the topic at hand in an atmosphere of kindness and respect.
I agree that such an account sounds really unlikely, but Jesus rising from the dead sounds a million times less likely! Without pushing too hard, you might want to ask some gentle and direct questions on the topic.
Some traditions also believe that God is the entity which is currently answering prayers for intervention or information or opinions. In other words, presuppositionalists do not believe that the existence of God can be proven by appeal to raw, uninterpreted, or "brute" facts, which have the same theoretical meaning to people with fundamentally different worldviews, because they deny that such a condition is even possible.
Apatheism An apatheist is someone who is not interested in accepting or denying any claims that gods exist or do not exist. Jesus, who died and rose again.
Even as facilitators, you should express your views and reasons for believing in God in order to foster openness. The non-overlapping magisteria view proposed by Stephen Jay Gould also holds that the existence or otherwise of God is irrelevant to and beyond the domain of science.
After the study you can provide articles on this topic or discuss it further as the lesson continues. A perfect deity does not need to make anything.
We see causality and meaning behind things that have none. He believed that God cannot be understood or be compared. In this sense, I suppose I am an agnostic atheist.
At this point, simply let everybody, including facilitators, express their views and discuss them. And how do you prove that Jesus rose from the dead anyway?
Ibn Rushd a 12th-century Islamic scholar Many Islamic scholars have used philosophical and rational arguments to prove the existence of God. Agnostic theism Agnostic theism is the philosophical view that encompasses both theism and agnosticism.
For the purposes of discussion, Richard Dawkins described seven "milestones" on his spectrum of theistic probability: Also, what are the key questions they would ask of Him? Even if it was scientifically accurate, how does that prove there is a god?
Relevance allow about 6 minutes for this section Discussion Prompt 1: Humans have lost and rediscovered much scientific knowledge throughout history.The holidays are rolling around, and for many, this means a heightened religious life. In light of this, I would like to start a general discussion about the existence of god.
I will start. I think I would consider myself an agnostic with regards to the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient. Encourage open discussion on this topic and work to create an atmosphere where unbelievers have to face some new ideas about God’s existence.
If there is a really tough objection, acknowledge it honestly and bring it up at the end of the hour.
Free Essay: Discussion of the Existence of God There is a lot of argument about does God exist or not exist.
It was long time every person wanted to prove. Loading Discussion. God exists. Does God Allow Evil: Is the Existence of God Compatible with the Existence of Evil?
God Exists Gods existence can by understood by rationality 64 Sign up. Log in. Explore. Search. Tour. About. Jun 03, · A god proofing the Universe into existence seems like magic to me.
I believe everything works according to the natural laws. The fact that the various books in the bible have one primary theme is because the compilers of the bible planned it.
10 Answers for Atheists: How to Have an Intelligent Discussion About the Existence of God [Alex McFarland, Eric Metaxas] on killarney10mile.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. With notable nonbelievers such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens featured prominently in the media/5(16).Download