After our quick review, the teacher will facilitate a whole group discussion by recording student responses on the front board. Model the use of the self-edit column with the displayed text, with you assuming the role of author. It is helpful to put the editing checklist on an overhead projector or document camera so all students can see the process.
Prior to having students use this tool independently, it is important to model its use. That student works through the items in the self-edit column as the other students observe.
All comparisons and contrasts clearly relate to and support the topic and assignment. Fair The main idea is somewhat clear. Score Organization Good Details are placed in logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
When they are ready for the editing stage of the writing process, students should edit their writing and then meet with a partner to engage in peer editing.
Do you get a sense of closure from the conclusion? Score Content Good There is one clear, well-focused topic. Student should have already worked through content revisions before reaching the editing step.
Does the structure develop effectively? Be as specific as you can. What types of support does the structure use? You should read over the essay.
An opportunity to provide and receive peer feedback on the assignment. Have the two students sit in the middle of the class so that all students can see and hear them as they work through the peer-editing phase.
It is a way to get a different perception of what you have written and "to see what your draft is like to someone outside your head" Used many adjectives throughout to make topic seem real and vivid. Does the writer establish credibility?
An excellent definition essay will handle the rhetorical situation and elements of composition in the following ways: One partner will proofread the essay for the proper use of accurate scientific evidence - the role of the Science Teacher.
While the students are working in groups, move from group to group to check their understanding of the editing process and use of the checklist. The student contributions will be organized by the specific body systems. These summary reports for the earthworm, crayfish, and rat identify unique qualities of each anatomical body system.
Students will reference their summary reports from each of the three dissections that were completed in prior class sessions. Next, In a couple sentences, write down what you thought was most effective about the essay as well as what you thought was problematic about the essay. The writer used at least 3 of the 5 senses well.
Please note that the revising stage precedes editing. Bring in two 2 copies of your letter. Then, Look at the structure of the draft and answer the following questions:Due: _____ in class Length/Format: 1 page for each Peer Review Partner.
Description: An opportunity to provide and receive peer feedback on the assignment. Purpose/Goals: The purpose of the Peer Review is to provide detailed and constructive feedback on the Compare/Contrast Essay; to indicate the writer's strengths, effective use of persuasive.
Paper addresses assignment Examples are detailed and concise, not generalizations Persuasive: essay points and details are believable. Tone is professional, informative, & engaging Writing is appropriate for intended audience (the teacher).
Peer Editing Checklist for Compare and Contrast Essay. Directions: Read through the entire essay for a clear understanding of what the essay is trying to communicate.
iRubric TA: Rubric to assess writing and editing skills. Free rubric builder and assessment tools. The Compare/Contrast Essay The compare/contrast essay is easy and rewarding to teach because: You can convince students there is a reason for learning it.
Peer Editing BEFORE you send in your work (as a PDF if possible), please read someone else’s from your same assignment in order to give feedback. Give specific feedback as to why you chose each number you did on the rubric.Download